Category Archives: google

How to make a graphically rich web site search engine friendly

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase

Some folks might know that we started our own ebook publishing company and the big announcement will be at Emerald City Comic Con on the 13th of March 2010. What has been interesting though is as we have been busy building the web site, we are working a lot with Google Web Master tools, guidelines, and the Web Master Checklist in building the site because it is graphically rich.

About 80% of the web site is going to be images, as we are offering a free cover browser, free to read online comics that are copyright expired or have moved into the public domain as a way to show our work and the things that can be done with Amazon DTP, PDF’s, and then just skimming through the comic books online. When dealing with a graphically rich web site, having enough text for the search engines to bite into so that they can spider the site is very important. According to Google, these are the types of files that Google can scan:

• Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf)
• Adobe PostScript (.ps)
• Atom and RSS feeds (.atom, .rss)
• Autodesk Design Web Format (.dwf)
• Google Earth (.kml, .kmz)
• Lotus 1-2-3 (.wk1, .wk2, .wk3, .wk4, .wk5, .wki, .wks, .wku)
• Lotus WordPro (.lwp)
• MacWrite (.mw)
• Microsoft Excel (.xls)
• Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt)
• Microsoft Word (.doc)
• Microsoft Works (.wks, .wps, .wdb)
• Microsoft Write (.wri)
• Open Document Format (.odt)
• Rich Text Format (.rtf)
• Shockwave Flash (.swf)
• Text (.ans, .txt)
• Wireless Markup Language (.wml, .wap)
Source: Google

Nowhere in there is JPG, PNG, or GIF files that we are using. Therefore, this has required a liberal use of the tag to describe the image. While we are not interested in “keyword stuffing” because of its negative effects, what we are interested in is describing the picture. So our alt tag looks something like this and that seems to be in line with the expectations of Google, meaning it will work with just about any search engine. The other part of this was to make sure each page has a title, and that the title was SEO friendly. We are also using a lot of meta tags throughout the site to help search engines spider the site better.

This is one of the more interesting aspects of designing and developing a graphically rich web site, in that the use of with good descriptors, and the use of Meta Tags are about the only real way of giving search engines enough information to spider, without distracting the reader from the content on the page, which is a scanned image of a comic book page. If there are other ways of doing this, drop a note below, it would be interesting to hear other people’s experiences in designing a graphically rich web site that is search engine friendly.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Picnik gets acquired by Google

In great news for Seattle Startups, Picnik gets picked up by Google in some interesting M&A activity, because everyone is going to be thinking of Flickr and SmugMug being right in the sights of Google. Online photo editing and storage just hit an air pocket.

Picnik was a clear winner in the Seattle 2.0 awards in 2009 (look for the 2010 awards as well, tickets are on sale here) because they are an awesome company with a cool software package suit that makes online photo editing and sharing very easy. With today’s acquisition by Google, it is looking like Google is taking a direct shot at Flickr and SmugMug which are the two best properties for storing pictures online (in the case of Flickr) and photo editing which SmugMug allows you to do in a limited fashion.

From the Picnik Blog today:

And all this leads us to today’s exciting news: we’ve just been acquired by Google! What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we’ll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. Source: Picnik Blog

What happens from here should be interesting with Google’s ability to search and parse image data, adding to this the easy way to store and process and share images will give Google a leg up in the picture sharing and management space that they did not have before. While I will stick with SmugMug, and continue to use Flickr for the occasional pictures, Google just landed heavily in the picture sharing, storage, and processing market, with one of the coolest suites of software out in the market place today.

Good for Picnik, good for Google, this is going to be hard on Flickr and SmugMug in the future.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Jesse Stay hits the Copyright Wall

Jesse Stay is one of the better people to follow on the internet and his writing is always interesting to read, plus he also owns Social Too and has written two books as well. Jesse is no stranger to generating content, startups, and some generally interesting reading on his blog. What has apparently happened is that Jessie has noticed that Google is stripping his ads off his RSS feed, shoving his full content into Buzz, and then monetizing the content without Jessie getting a dime. As he states on his blog today

To be clear, I’m fine with them either displaying the ads that I put there (and allowing me to monetize off the other ads that are on the page), or just summarizing the article and encouraging users to click through to my site. I’m not okay with Google scraping my content, stripping my ads, altering my content, and pushing it out for them to get 100% of the revenues off of something I spent time and money making. Source: Stayin’ Alive

What makes this interesting to me is that there seems to be two types of copyright, copyright for big corporations under the rule of Law like the DMCA, and the forthcoming ACTA (which should scare you if you read Micheal Geist), then there is copyright for the rest of us. Bloggers who deal with scrapers is a daily issue. What makes this more interesting is the number of headlines from such companies as the MPAA who had to remove the MPAA Toolkit for copyright infringement. There is the long drawn out battle between Shepard Fairey and the AP over a picture of Obama where copyright was clearly in dispute over who owned what. Pictures of Obama being used in Fashion Ads. There is a 15 year old Dallas student who without permission find their pictures ripped from Flickr and used in an advertising campaign in Australia. Or even big media companies like ESPN playing commercials that used pictures that did not belong to them and the owner was not compensated. Google is no new comer to this controversy – they are desperately trying to get a book settlement through the courts that allows them to scan books that are without findable owners and drop them into their search system.

Jessie, and indeed many bloggers and people who actually do create new content are at the rock and hard place. While it great to add a CC 2.0 share and share alike copyright, or even insist on full copyright of all materials on our blogs, the reality is that many people are trying to make money off of what creators write. It is not just limited to shady scrapers, it has permeated the entire culture, we scrape we make money. It is everywhere, my fair share notification each week shows me tens of sites that scrape every single article I write. I have only authorized two sites to use content from my two original blogs.

This is where things get interesting, and where it might be time for bloggers to take a deep look at what is happening to our content on the internet. How it is used, who uses it and who monetizes it. How we share monetization from the major advertising systems that use our content to make money. How we view full text feeds which are popular and in many cases necessary to keep readers. I do not recommend a RIAA/MPAA style pogrom, but a deep research project in how much money is really made by others monetizing content while the creators get little or nothing. We might find that we are ahead of the game or behind the game, but maybe it is time to seriously look at the blogging model we have now, and see if there is a way to ensure that the few copyrights we do have are respected and not subverted by a larger company.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Shocking yet another way to ruin privacy via Twitter

Image representing ReadWriteWeb as depicted in...
Image via CrunchBase

With ReadWriteWeb Marshall Kirkpatrick on a roll today about Mark Zukerburg and the end of the age of privacy, with follow up from Steven Hodson (fixed) it is time to look not just at Facebook, but at other tools that are out there than can also alter your personal privacy landscape.

While I think that there are something’s that I do that are private, like Steven Hodges I think there are limits to what I will post online and where I will post it. There are a lot of things that I know or do that will never see the light of day on Facebook, in a Blog, or otherwise be exploited online. The things that I do personally expose are those things that I am proud of, or things that I do that I am not particularly worried about if anyone finds out. We should all be aware that what we put online is forever, and can dramatically lessen or improve your chances of being hired.

What is a counterpoint to all this is a little observed post from Louis Gray over the weekend about a spanking new toy called Searchtastic. It is specifically designed to look for tweets on keywords that you are looking for, and identifies the people talking about it. In a lot of ways this is as equally interesting as “Tweeting too hard” or “People of Walmart” or anything else that is online that we laugh at or scorn and mock in so many ways. When I run a search on where I work, it is very easy to mine Twitter looking for recent comments about what is being said about the school.

SearchtasticCityU

It is also very interesting who is talking about my Tagline especially after mentioning Twitter Marketing Hell by Steven Hodson.

searchtasticTechwag

What is even more interesting is when I type in something that would be generally frowned upon in polite society. If I was a cop I would love this, if I was a social researcher – I would love this just as much. I would love the excel export feature even more.

stoned

It is amazing what we say online anyway, without thinking about it. It is not so much that privacy is at an end, or that we should not do things that we would do anyways. It is more about how we treat the internet and what we say online than anything else. While everyone had a fit over what Sergey Brin said about Privacy on Google – the sad realization is that privacy really hasn’t been something that we have been able to count on for a long time.

Some of the new tools like Searchtastic, deep mining of Google information, court house records online, People Search databases, and electronic records of all kinds are all searchable. All of these can be used to paint a profile of whom we are, who we associate with and what we think is important. This is of use to everyone who has even a passing voyeuristic impulse in finding out anything about anyone. Especially if they are posting it online themselves, there is little guilt here in using that information in ways they might not expect, from the state to the federal government, law enforcement, or even just the casual passerby.

While all of this is important, what is more important is to educate people on what they are doing, starting in elementary school. Show them that the internet is forever, that the electronic footprints you leave behind can and will be used to form an opinion of you (and in some cases could cost you your job or future job) and what you do. If you do things on line that are socially not acceptable, then expect to pay the price of that social stigma.

The point we need to realize is that it is not just one system, privacy is not about Facebook, privacy is not about Google, Searchtastic or any other way that we can mine the internet for information. The problem of Privacy is about us, as people, and the image that we think is cool to portray. That is where we need to start, not beating on companies, but informing ourselves to make better decisions. In the mean time – check out Texts from Last Night – more things that should never be said.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Wow the Android App Store Stinks

Image representing Nexus One as depicted in Cr...
Image via CrunchBase

With all the hype about the Nexus One today, and knowing that I am still in the market for a cell phone, I wanted to see what all they might have that would make this more interesting. The problem is going through the web interface of the Android Market Place simply stinks – only top featured apps, no browsing capability – no search – and all this from Search Engine King Google.

I am not the only one to notice this; Android developers are also complaining about it, the developers are complaining about this as well in an article from GigaOm.

The low download volumes and lack of profits speak to the fact that app discovery isn’t easy in the Android Marketplace. Having used Android Marketplace for many months now, I have to say the experience is sub-par. Eighty-two percent of those surveyed felt that the Android Marketplace’s design makes it difficult for apps to be noticed. As I pointed out earlier, special marketplaces being set up by phone companies is only going to muddy the waters. Source:GigaOm

The only problem with the GigaOm article is that they quote a 30 respondent questionnaire, and other article shows that there are a huge number of projects ramping up to take advantage of the app store. Unfortunately though, this is the current landing page for the Android Market Place.

androidmarketplace

That isn’t going to work, especially if you want to browse and see what Android offers before you go splurge a few hundred dollars on a device. 20K apps is ok, but if you can’t see them, you can’t download them, and consumers will wonder what they bought.

Surprisingly this is a Google effort that looks like it needs some serious work. Normally when dealing with any Google system even in Beta there is a certain amount of polish. Even Google Wave had polish if it was confusing and painful to use. Realistically, and this is where Apple tends to get it right, the User Interface is huge, and while it might look good from the Google Phone of choice, from a web visitor viewpoint the web site is just plain old sad. Apple at least lets you tool around the App Store, although with the hundreds of thousands of apps they have navigating them might be difficult, it is not as difficult as the Google Android Store.

Seriously – Google needs to get this one together and make it easy to search, find, purchase, and all from the web.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875 ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875