Category Archives: idea

Gnomedex Day 1 Afternoon Speakers

These are the afternoon speakers at Gnomedex Day 1.

Gnomedex Day 1 Afternoon Shoot

Gnomedex Day 1 Afternoon Shoot

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Gnomedex 2010 Day 1 Morning Speakers

This is the morning shoot of Gnomedex 2010 – unfortunately this is the last Gnomedex forever or until Chris figures out that he would like to do this. This feels almost like the last huzzah – and in someways is fairly sad.

Gnomedex Day 1 Morning Shoot

Last Gnomedex ever – the morning shoot

tags: gnomedex

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

I think we forgot something on the way to the future

Ida May Fuller, the first recipient
Image via Wikipedia

Our future was supposed to be bright and shiny, I think we messed up somewhere along the line. I do not normally write about politics, and I try to keep this blog generally upbeat. While I am busy building out my company and seeing good growth and support from the people we serve, there are darker issues cropping up that are going to color how we look at our country and the people who live here. Here are some general observations on the issues as I see them.

Where we are now is falling steadily backwards, where large companies like Apple are telling people what they can and cannot watch on their magical devices, dictating what technology can and cannot be used on devices and systems. Imagine if Microsoft was to say no to Flash like Apple has, it would be a disaster that would invite the US Department of Justice to come visit Microsoft HQ in Redmond. Apple though – it is hubris to think that people will not work their way around restrictions and this includes flash. The litany of jail broken phones (security flaws and all) testifies to the fact that people will alter the software running a system so that they can do what they want to do. Apple also needs to learn that people want racy material – porn is still a huge industry worldwide, they might was well profit from it like other companies have. Amazon, Ebay, and many other companies have figured this simple equation out, porn and racy material sells, and sells well. That is why there are such things as the “adult” section on many web sites. Companies dictating morality has always been a disaster for that company, eventually morals change over time, just say no when the temptation gets too great.

Then we are faced with the crisis in labor, where something strange has happened, do we really want to also go back to different golden moment, the 1920’s where there was no FDIC, no Social Security, no health care if you could not afford it. The paupers oath that put many into work houses? In many ways with our 60-80 hour work weeks that we accept at work we lost our Union negotiated 40 hour work weeks and are no better off than our 1920 compatriots in industry. We still work very long hours for pay that has not increased in an increasingly uncertain work environment. The dissolution of the Unions has paved the way to degrading real wages and an increase in working hours in work environments that may or may not be unsafe to a person’s health. It is good to get up and away from the computer for a couple of minutes every hour, some folks do not have that luxury as they labor under “metrics” that are in many ways physically impossible to deliver on and deliver a good customer experience in solving a problem or answering a question. The party of “no” and the party of “yes” have both lost their way on these issues; rather the infighting between them has lead to realizable losses to employment and employability undermining the “American dream”. My kids might not do as well as I have done, that alone is a tragedy. Multiply that by millions, and we are seeing dissolution of the United States as a progressive and inventive society. Humans are as disposable as Bic Pens, and that ignores the potential of every worker, and is immeasurably devaluing to human potential.

We have also forgotten the idea that people might just want and need a bit of privacy in our daily lives in favor of the “social graph”. We want to share the cool things we do, but we don’t want those cool things to keep us from being employed or enjoying our quality of life. We want a little privacy to go along with the things we share with our friends, because not everything we do is for public consumption. We might want to keep some moments intensely personal, like informing family that a member of the family might have cancer, or that they are now 150 days sober, or something else that an employer might take a dim view of. Corporations are in their businesses to make money, which is the reality of modern business; that goal should be tempered somewhere at a midpoint between making money and keeping us safe from those that would abuse that information. It would be tragic if we cannot find this midpoint – people are going to suddenly find out they are unemployable because a corporation has decided that the “social graph” should be more open and available to everyone, including the private bits of life. As long as people are foolish enough to post things that should be kept off the internet, we need to find a midpoint between monetizing the information, and a person’s need for privacy on very sensitive information. This is regardless of how it got there; we need to reaffirm our commitment to keeping something’s out of “cache” forever.

We have forgotten that there are many wonderful people out there that wish us well, but it seems that we are focused on the circus of the absurd where everyone is out to get us. Not everyone is a member of a terrorist organization, wants to be part of a militia, or wants to carry poorly spelled signs on a street corner. Some of us are really just simply nice people who might lean a little right or lean a little to the left. It is in that wonderful diversity of opinion, age, race, religious beliefs, and tolerance for each other that we really do shine and show off the best of humanity. We are not at our best when we are threatening to kill, maim, or otherwise silence those wonderful voices of dissent and alternative opinions. Our future is built upon people who think differently, see the unexpected, and then do some very alternative work to make that future happen. Homogeneity is not going to solve our water, air, power, or infrastructure issues. We need those dissenting opinions today to solve tomorrows national issues, unfortunately we are silencing them, meaning we cannot solve our nation’s problems today, we have to wait until something we need today is invented in some other country.

It used to be that we had two political parties that at times did try to work together to accomplish the common good for American People. It was two parties that passed the Social Security Act, FDIC Insurance, the Equal Opportunity Act, and under Johnson the “great society” ideal. Rather now we have a party of “no” and a party of “yes”, I hope that in 2012 we will not see a complete role reversal of roles. The gridlock in all political provinces has become a national liability; it is time for our parties to work together again to solve national issues. One party has never been able to go it totally alone.

It used to be that we would unite for a common good, when the planes hit the World Trade Center in 2001 this nation pulled together in ways that I had never personally seen. Now we are broken and fractured, fodder for demagogy and “hard liners” that have forgotten that we are people, not numbers in a statistic. We don’t need Vaseline under our eyes to cry, when we have to make the hard choice of feeding our children or putting gas in the car so we can get back and forth to work. The recession has had a devastating effect on all walks of life, it is time we start looking to uplift ourselves and our nation rather than spend our time squabbling over the leftovers on the table.

While I generally try to be upbeat and attempt at being realistic in how I view the world we have found ourselves at the tail end of a devastating two years economically and socially. While some of these changes started well over 10 years ago such as the use of Perma Temps in technology, the net effect is culminating today. We have the time and energy to revision our society as a progressive, advanced, and innovative society like we were able to envision in the 1940’s and in the 1960’s, and 1990’s. We should be doing this and it is happening in pockets across the nation, but do we have the national and personal will to be what we should be.

This is my personal opinion, and does not reflect the opinion of anyone else around me, who employs me, who might employ me, or who might otherwise have any passing interest in what I might be up to today.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Who controls what happens in your browser

Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...
Image via CrunchBase

Interesting tidbit over at Techdirt this morning about a Grease Monkey script called Fluff Busting Purity formerly known as Facebook Purity. While the Techdirt article is good, there are some interesting side issues here that should be noted.

Many people run scripts within their browser that kills data coming in from web sites, most popular ones are the ad blocking software that has caused so much angst for people who try to make a living or at least a little pocket change from the ads on their site. This includes Ars Technica doing a trial of blocking content if the ads are blocked.

Facebook presents an interesting issue of “who controls what you render in your browser” by taking on Facebook Purity under a number of different concepts. One is the well understood “brand image” process where something using a brand name is generally a bad idea, meaning that Facebook Purity was taken down because the software used the name “facebook” as its software name. Generally this is well understood even if you can put up an “I hate facebook site” much like the popular “I hate starbucks site” or other negative sites concerning big brand names. But in an interesting tactic Facebook deleted the Fan Page for Facebook Purity as commented on the now named “Fluff busing purity” site:

Well Facebook decided to kill the F.B. Purity Fan Page, with practically zero notice, at the time of execution the page had 5042 fans, and I had spent a hell of a long time building the community up. How goddamn rude of them! Now they are after this domain too, and they seem to be intent on shutting down the script… Yet another example of this *^%&%^ company treating their users with contempt. Source: Fluff Busing Purity

Techdirt brings in the idea that:

So the guy changed the name to Fluff Busting Purity. No trademark issue at all. But Facebook is still complaining. The thing is, this is a Greasemonkey user script — meaning that everything happens in the user’s browser — which Facebook has no claim over. If you tell your browser to ignore certain things on a website, that should be your choice. This add-on is there to help people who want it, such that it makes Facebook more useful to them. Source: Techdirt http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100324/1806018708.shtml

It is well worth reading the FB Purity news page also linked from the developers Twitter page. Facebook is in general pulling out the big legal folks and generally going after the developer. This makes this more of an issue of what happens when someone writes a script that people use that masks content in the browser on the user’s machine. There is a bigger picture here as ad blocking software and other scripts that block content from the server to the browser are very popular. While this might not hit the courts, there is already many blocking type software packages out there. Even Google with its “Safe Search” option blocks information from people who do not want to see it. Realistically, if Facebook wins this one, the control of what is rendered in the browser is at stake, with a deeper ramification to ad blocking software and other software that performs the same function.

Facebook has taken out a larger dragnet with larger implications than one grease monkey script, and opened another issue that has not been dealt with by the courts. The issue is what control does a user have over what a server sends them. Law needs to catch up with technology if that is possible, and while it is unlikely to go to court, this is a bigger issue and one that we should all take notice of in general. People love ad blocker scripts and software, people love scripts like FB Purity, and companies generally hate them because it damages revenue streams. At some point, this issue will go to the courts, and when it does, people need to win to keep control of what happens in their browser.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Lessons from your own startup The 15 Second Pitch

Emerald City ComiCon
Image via Wikipedia

Recently our startup participated in Emerald City Comic Con, as we sell comic books and science fiction books, we also launched our publishing house at the same time. What makes this interesting for anyone doing a startup is how to manage the elevator pitch of not just informing people of your current company, but also what your new startup can do for them.

What makes the 15 second pitch interesting is that you have a short time to grab people’s attention, once you have it you can go further with the story line about what your new startup is about and what you are doing. There are reasons you are doing your own startup, the process of getting people’s interesting is the challenge.

The problem I think with the 15 second pitch is that you have to overcome people’s belief systems. There have been so many fly by night poorly run, poorly managed companies that have taken people for granted that the 15 second pitch is about changing beliefs. Making the person, you are talking to believe in what you are doing, and how it works for everyone involved. The pitchman has to make sure that the people they are talking to understands that there really is something in this for everyone. Most industries are tainted; it is hard to break through that initial skepticism that people have because of other folks who have done bad or poorly managed companies.

I did about 20 of the 15 second pitch style discussions over the weekend and the reactions were interesting to see, some did not believe, they simply could not believe in what I was doing. There was fear from some folks about having their ideas stolen. There were just a few people who also were able to believe and that lead to some interesting conversations about the publishing business, risk, reward, and I think I will hear from those people again. The majority, 80% at least, simply could not suspend their belief systems enough that they would want to participate. In the end though that is ok, what I am finding is that business, especially in a startup, you have to play many roles. Those people who cannot believe in what you are doing are best not involved, as they will need a mother and father figure to help them over their own internal hurdles. These are the kinds of people who are expensive in time and effort with little to no rewards for that effort.

If you are doing a startup and are working on your pitch, watch the body language when presenting in person. You can tell rapidly when someone is going to listen, or when you have crossed their own internal barriers to belief and support of your idea. It is not your issue, rather it is their issue, through being burned in the past, unable to grasp what you are doing or your company and your idea simply cannot get the support of people in their own minds. If you are lucky enough to see the reaction to what you are doing, you can modify the pitch on the fly to see if you can get someone to believe in the idea the same way you do, but in the longer run, that 15 second pitch is all you have. Sometimes people simply cannot believe in what you are doing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875 ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875