Category Archives: news

Picnik gets acquired by Google

In great news for Seattle Startups, Picnik gets picked up by Google in some interesting M&A activity, because everyone is going to be thinking of Flickr and SmugMug being right in the sights of Google. Online photo editing and storage just hit an air pocket.

Picnik was a clear winner in the Seattle 2.0 awards in 2009 (look for the 2010 awards as well, tickets are on sale here) because they are an awesome company with a cool software package suit that makes online photo editing and sharing very easy. With today’s acquisition by Google, it is looking like Google is taking a direct shot at Flickr and SmugMug which are the two best properties for storing pictures online (in the case of Flickr) and photo editing which SmugMug allows you to do in a limited fashion.

From the Picnik Blog today:

And all this leads us to today’s exciting news: we’ve just been acquired by Google! What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we’ll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. Source: Picnik Blog

What happens from here should be interesting with Google’s ability to search and parse image data, adding to this the easy way to store and process and share images will give Google a leg up in the picture sharing and management space that they did not have before. While I will stick with SmugMug, and continue to use Flickr for the occasional pictures, Google just landed heavily in the picture sharing, storage, and processing market, with one of the coolest suites of software out in the market place today.

Good for Picnik, good for Google, this is going to be hard on Flickr and SmugMug in the future.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

The JooJoo Crunchpad debacle demonstrates the value of checking your partners

Image representing Fusion Garage as depicted i...
Image via CrunchBase

Business is built on trusting the other person to do what they say they are going to do. This is a relationship that extends across the entire business spectrum, and controversy aside, the issues with the Crunchpad/JooJoo Fusion Garage and Techcrunch demonstrates just how important it is to check your business partners and make a cold assessment as to how trustworthy they are.

Kraft Foods in their Code of Conduct sums up trust well.

Trust is Fragile. It makes many years to build, but can disappear in an instant. Source: Kraft Foods Code of Conduct (Opens a PDF)

Finding good responsible business partners is not an easy task. It is even more difficult when you are trying to do something novel and unique. Some business partners just are not going to work out, this is why you need to look at business partners carefully. What is disturbing from the post on Techcrunch this morning is the level of information about how shady Fusion Garage was. What is amazing is that Techcrunch continued the relationship. There is a lot of cynicism that can undermine the effectiveness of IT partnerships, and watching this very public breakup of Techcrunch and Fusion Garage should make anyone looking for an OEM/ODM partner to stop for a moment and think about how trustworthy the people we do business with actually are.

Even Google has their moments with trust, with the words of CEO of Google talking about USA Patriot Act and how privacy is not a guarantee when using Google products or services. This has caused a lot of angst and some interesting conversations online, much like the breach of trust between Fusion Garage and Techcrunch.

What is amazing is that Techcrunch did not pull the plug on Fusion Garage once the nature and background of the principles became known. Some of the comments in their note about the federal lawsuit filed tend to confuse the imagination, if Techcrunch knew the company was shady, why didn’t they pull the plug earlier?

Fusion Garage is, and always has been, a company on the edge of going out of business.

The company was constantly raising debt from unsavory investors, borderline loan sharks, to make payroll.

Source: Techcrunch

While I have deep sympathy for Techcrunch, Michael Arrington and everyone who worked on the project, what is simply amazing is that Techcrunch knowing these things about the company did not pull the plug and find another OEM/ODM for the project. Everyone in the blogosphere would have understood and supported Techcrunch if they said that they needed to find another OEM/ODM for their project. We would have waited patiently for the toy, we would have been still talking about it and offering our advice and our support.

Now we are simply looking at two former partners on a project where it was the duty of Techcrunch to be evaluating their technology partners. We all want to trust, but trust is fragile and it is easily destroyed by the most simple of issues. When a business partner becomes too much of a liability or they do not look like they have the wherewithal to bring a product to market in a timely manner, then any company needs to reevaluate the relationship.

While I am not a lawyer, the document embedded at the end of the Techcrunch article which forms the basis of the lawsuit is actually interesting and worth reading all the way through. What is interesting is that the JooJoo domain was registered 10 November 2009, fully 7 days before the relationship was “terminated” by Fusion Garage.

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: THEJOOJOO.COM
Created on: 10-Nov-09
Expires on: 10-Nov-11
Last Updated on: 10-Nov-09

Source: GoDaddy

This would demonstrate some serious issues with Fusion Garage, and the original lawsuit document is a very good read. I’ll probably end up using this in my education job at CityU of Seattle in my Intellectual Property Class as a case study. I’ll post the case study publicly when the entire case is over with, but for now, this is a great learning tool, not just for students, but for anyone who is in hardware manufacturing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Massive Bittorrent Site Closures in China

VeryCD Logo
Image via Wikipedia

The Chinese government has been busily shutting down Bittorrent sharing sites over the last 10 days causing a rush to download across China according to Sina. The rush to download has degraded Bittorrent services with the remaining servers that are still up and running.

As the largest BT download website in China with 5 million downloads each year, VeryCD has been on the verge of closure after the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) shut hundreds of similar peer-to-peer file sharing sites, including the 50 million-user BTChina, during the last 10 days in its latest attempt to fight pornography and piracy online. Source: Sina

What makes this different is that some of the Bittorrent sites have applied for licenses to distribute media, audio and video but have been unable to get official distribution licenses from the Chinese Government. Bittorrent sites in China often have a lot of material that is monitored or censored by the government, and that is part of the reason for the clamp down.

The calls for Bittorrent and other rapid sharing sites to be nurtured by the Chinese government is also an interesting call coming from people who are closely aligned with the survival of the Bittorrent system. With the closure of the Pirate Bay and other mega Bittorrent servers in the west, Bittorrent is quickly hitting the endangered species list for file sharing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Facebook Hacked for Real this time

Facebook, Inc.
Image via Wikipedia

Control your info has taken administrative rights to hundreds of groups on Facebook this morning – which is going to prompt a stampede of fear across the Facebook landscape. Looking at the security of social networking – this is going to be a bad day for many groups on Facebook.

The group Control your Info has taken over a large number of groups (some reports of upwards of 300) overnight to highlight the security issues with the Facebook system and administration of pages.

facebookhack

Which of course means that the people who are using those Facebook pages are not happy about what is being done to their pages; the comments from the subscribers are priceless.

controlyourinfoShot2

We can talk about the security of systems, but in the end, we are dealing with a messy human designed system where security is not going to be job one. Facebook security is tending to become the Achilles’ heel of the web site much like Aaron Greenspan proposed on CNET back in February 2008. As we see more and more issues like this coming from Facebook, including the simple to fix but dreaded crossdomain.xml file which is also something that has been talked about since 2008. These things are not new, we know about them, but major web sites are quietly accepting easy fix high risk implementations of information security that are putting millions of people and their business models at risk.

While it is possible to get hold of Facebook security, you have to wonder what their web penetration team (if they have one) is doing. Are they taking huge lunch breaks or are they just simply ineffective? I would vote for ineffective right now because many of the hacks that are being exploited today were talked about last year. If it takes a year to fix something very simple, then there are issues with the internal security group, and there are structural issues with the organization as a whole. It took the fear of predators and children to bring down MySpace, it will be the fear of hackers that will bring down Facebook eventually unless they somehow manage to get it together and start taking a serious systematic approach to information security.

Beyond the fake scammy games, beyond the hackers, and beyond the predator issues that also crop up on Facebook, web 2.0 needs to get security right. They are dealing with a lot of private information, and they are dealing with people who trust Facebook to do the right thing and help keep them safe while using the web site. At this point, we have to question if Facebook can get this right, or if they need to find a highly competent security team that will tear the web site and code apart, and then help Facebook put it back together again. There are some awesome companies that will help do this, and it is time that Facebook gets serious about security, and their reputation.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Causes leaves MySpace this is interesting

Facebook, Inc.
Image via Wikipedia

Causes is a social networking donation platform that uses MySpace so that people can raise money for causes or issues that they believe in. Generally these kinds of activities help provide a community around issues like Breast Cancer, or stop smoking, or other issues that are part of our daily life. Causes is an excellent application that makes the process of raising and donating money for a specific cause very easy and embeddable into someone’s MySpace page.

Last night according to ReadWriteWeb and Stanford Social Innovation Review, Causes has sent an e-mail out to all their MySpace members stating that they will be moving over to Facebook and no longer supporting MySpace. I do not see why they could not do both, but apparently Causes does not want to support both platforms. From a business viewpoint – Causes would be very smart to provide support for both platforms; everyone needs a simple easy way to donate to the cause they believe in.

Stanford Social Innovation Review though also brings up the specter of money, in that it is well known that Facebook caters to a richer clientele than MySpace. Going out to Quanticast – the demographics for MySpace and Facebook makes this a compelling argument.

MySpace Demographics:

Facebook Demographics:

What is interesting about the Quanticast information is on the right side data pane where people who are likely to visit Facebook, Causes shows up as the number one entry in the likely to visit category.

causeslikeytovisit

Where on the likely to visit column causes does not even show up.

myspacelikelytovisit

Demographics are also telling – people are much less likely to be college educated on MySpace, meaning they just simply do not make a lot of money. However, some research points out that poor people donate more overall money to causes that influence their groups or their interest groups than rich people do. The problem also might be in the micropayments processing side; small amounts of money usually are quickly degraded by mounting fees from payment processors, handling, and movement than larger payments, which is a definite possibility and, one of the drawbacks to the micropayment system.

What is sad though is that rather than supporting both platforms, which is just good business, Causes has decided to abandon MySpace in favor of Facebook. Regardless of the reason, from a business viewpoint you don’t abandon a channel until it stops being profitable, if Causes believes that MySpace is no longer profitable, then there is more here about the internal workings and visitor counts of MySpace than we generally have discussed in the blogging world, let alone the press.

Causes definitely needs to post a statement on their blog, so we know what the reason is, rather than speculating as to what the reasons are.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875 ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875