Category Archives: Politics

I think we forgot something on the way to the future

Ida May Fuller, the first recipient
Image via Wikipedia

Our future was supposed to be bright and shiny, I think we messed up somewhere along the line. I do not normally write about politics, and I try to keep this blog generally upbeat. While I am busy building out my company and seeing good growth and support from the people we serve, there are darker issues cropping up that are going to color how we look at our country and the people who live here. Here are some general observations on the issues as I see them.

Where we are now is falling steadily backwards, where large companies like Apple are telling people what they can and cannot watch on their magical devices, dictating what technology can and cannot be used on devices and systems. Imagine if Microsoft was to say no to Flash like Apple has, it would be a disaster that would invite the US Department of Justice to come visit Microsoft HQ in Redmond. Apple though – it is hubris to think that people will not work their way around restrictions and this includes flash. The litany of jail broken phones (security flaws and all) testifies to the fact that people will alter the software running a system so that they can do what they want to do. Apple also needs to learn that people want racy material – porn is still a huge industry worldwide, they might was well profit from it like other companies have. Amazon, Ebay, and many other companies have figured this simple equation out, porn and racy material sells, and sells well. That is why there are such things as the “adult” section on many web sites. Companies dictating morality has always been a disaster for that company, eventually morals change over time, just say no when the temptation gets too great.

Then we are faced with the crisis in labor, where something strange has happened, do we really want to also go back to different golden moment, the 1920’s where there was no FDIC, no Social Security, no health care if you could not afford it. The paupers oath that put many into work houses? In many ways with our 60-80 hour work weeks that we accept at work we lost our Union negotiated 40 hour work weeks and are no better off than our 1920 compatriots in industry. We still work very long hours for pay that has not increased in an increasingly uncertain work environment. The dissolution of the Unions has paved the way to degrading real wages and an increase in working hours in work environments that may or may not be unsafe to a person’s health. It is good to get up and away from the computer for a couple of minutes every hour, some folks do not have that luxury as they labor under “metrics” that are in many ways physically impossible to deliver on and deliver a good customer experience in solving a problem or answering a question. The party of “no” and the party of “yes” have both lost their way on these issues; rather the infighting between them has lead to realizable losses to employment and employability undermining the “American dream”. My kids might not do as well as I have done, that alone is a tragedy. Multiply that by millions, and we are seeing dissolution of the United States as a progressive and inventive society. Humans are as disposable as Bic Pens, and that ignores the potential of every worker, and is immeasurably devaluing to human potential.

We have also forgotten the idea that people might just want and need a bit of privacy in our daily lives in favor of the “social graph”. We want to share the cool things we do, but we don’t want those cool things to keep us from being employed or enjoying our quality of life. We want a little privacy to go along with the things we share with our friends, because not everything we do is for public consumption. We might want to keep some moments intensely personal, like informing family that a member of the family might have cancer, or that they are now 150 days sober, or something else that an employer might take a dim view of. Corporations are in their businesses to make money, which is the reality of modern business; that goal should be tempered somewhere at a midpoint between making money and keeping us safe from those that would abuse that information. It would be tragic if we cannot find this midpoint – people are going to suddenly find out they are unemployable because a corporation has decided that the “social graph” should be more open and available to everyone, including the private bits of life. As long as people are foolish enough to post things that should be kept off the internet, we need to find a midpoint between monetizing the information, and a person’s need for privacy on very sensitive information. This is regardless of how it got there; we need to reaffirm our commitment to keeping something’s out of “cache” forever.

We have forgotten that there are many wonderful people out there that wish us well, but it seems that we are focused on the circus of the absurd where everyone is out to get us. Not everyone is a member of a terrorist organization, wants to be part of a militia, or wants to carry poorly spelled signs on a street corner. Some of us are really just simply nice people who might lean a little right or lean a little to the left. It is in that wonderful diversity of opinion, age, race, religious beliefs, and tolerance for each other that we really do shine and show off the best of humanity. We are not at our best when we are threatening to kill, maim, or otherwise silence those wonderful voices of dissent and alternative opinions. Our future is built upon people who think differently, see the unexpected, and then do some very alternative work to make that future happen. Homogeneity is not going to solve our water, air, power, or infrastructure issues. We need those dissenting opinions today to solve tomorrows national issues, unfortunately we are silencing them, meaning we cannot solve our nation’s problems today, we have to wait until something we need today is invented in some other country.

It used to be that we had two political parties that at times did try to work together to accomplish the common good for American People. It was two parties that passed the Social Security Act, FDIC Insurance, the Equal Opportunity Act, and under Johnson the “great society” ideal. Rather now we have a party of “no” and a party of “yes”, I hope that in 2012 we will not see a complete role reversal of roles. The gridlock in all political provinces has become a national liability; it is time for our parties to work together again to solve national issues. One party has never been able to go it totally alone.

It used to be that we would unite for a common good, when the planes hit the World Trade Center in 2001 this nation pulled together in ways that I had never personally seen. Now we are broken and fractured, fodder for demagogy and “hard liners” that have forgotten that we are people, not numbers in a statistic. We don’t need Vaseline under our eyes to cry, when we have to make the hard choice of feeding our children or putting gas in the car so we can get back and forth to work. The recession has had a devastating effect on all walks of life, it is time we start looking to uplift ourselves and our nation rather than spend our time squabbling over the leftovers on the table.

While I generally try to be upbeat and attempt at being realistic in how I view the world we have found ourselves at the tail end of a devastating two years economically and socially. While some of these changes started well over 10 years ago such as the use of Perma Temps in technology, the net effect is culminating today. We have the time and energy to revision our society as a progressive, advanced, and innovative society like we were able to envision in the 1940’s and in the 1960’s, and 1990’s. We should be doing this and it is happening in pockets across the nation, but do we have the national and personal will to be what we should be.

This is my personal opinion, and does not reflect the opinion of anyone else around me, who employs me, who might employ me, or who might otherwise have any passing interest in what I might be up to today.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Who controls what happens in your browser

Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...
Image via CrunchBase

Interesting tidbit over at Techdirt this morning about a Grease Monkey script called Fluff Busting Purity formerly known as Facebook Purity. While the Techdirt article is good, there are some interesting side issues here that should be noted.

Many people run scripts within their browser that kills data coming in from web sites, most popular ones are the ad blocking software that has caused so much angst for people who try to make a living or at least a little pocket change from the ads on their site. This includes Ars Technica doing a trial of blocking content if the ads are blocked.

Facebook presents an interesting issue of “who controls what you render in your browser” by taking on Facebook Purity under a number of different concepts. One is the well understood “brand image” process where something using a brand name is generally a bad idea, meaning that Facebook Purity was taken down because the software used the name “facebook” as its software name. Generally this is well understood even if you can put up an “I hate facebook site” much like the popular “I hate starbucks site” or other negative sites concerning big brand names. But in an interesting tactic Facebook deleted the Fan Page for Facebook Purity as commented on the now named “Fluff busing purity” site:

Well Facebook decided to kill the F.B. Purity Fan Page, with practically zero notice, at the time of execution the page had 5042 fans, and I had spent a hell of a long time building the community up. How goddamn rude of them! Now they are after this domain too, and they seem to be intent on shutting down the script… Yet another example of this *^%&%^ company treating their users with contempt. Source: Fluff Busing Purity

Techdirt brings in the idea that:

So the guy changed the name to Fluff Busting Purity. No trademark issue at all. But Facebook is still complaining. The thing is, this is a Greasemonkey user script — meaning that everything happens in the user’s browser — which Facebook has no claim over. If you tell your browser to ignore certain things on a website, that should be your choice. This add-on is there to help people who want it, such that it makes Facebook more useful to them. Source: Techdirt http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100324/1806018708.shtml

It is well worth reading the FB Purity news page also linked from the developers Twitter page. Facebook is in general pulling out the big legal folks and generally going after the developer. This makes this more of an issue of what happens when someone writes a script that people use that masks content in the browser on the user’s machine. There is a bigger picture here as ad blocking software and other scripts that block content from the server to the browser are very popular. While this might not hit the courts, there is already many blocking type software packages out there. Even Google with its “Safe Search” option blocks information from people who do not want to see it. Realistically, if Facebook wins this one, the control of what is rendered in the browser is at stake, with a deeper ramification to ad blocking software and other software that performs the same function.

Facebook has taken out a larger dragnet with larger implications than one grease monkey script, and opened another issue that has not been dealt with by the courts. The issue is what control does a user have over what a server sends them. Law needs to catch up with technology if that is possible, and while it is unlikely to go to court, this is a bigger issue and one that we should all take notice of in general. People love ad blocker scripts and software, people love scripts like FB Purity, and companies generally hate them because it damages revenue streams. At some point, this issue will go to the courts, and when it does, people need to win to keep control of what happens in their browser.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Amazon sees renewed pressure to collect State Sales Tax

Amazon and other online retailers like EBay might not be able to dodge the tax collection business for much longer as States try increasingly to find new areas of revenue. Over the last couple of weeks, both Colorado and California have started passing legislation in one form or another that will mean that Amazon will have to seriously work on collecting sales tax.

Amazon, EBay and its myriad rivals have all had a very long free ticket about not collecting state sales tax. Although Washington State people who order off of Amazon pay Washington State Sales tax on a regular basis, Colorado, California and other states are back on the “collect state sales tax” bandwagon again this year. Last year Amazon and many other companies banded together to help stop the process. But as the recession drags on into its second year, cash strapped states are looking at online sales tax as one way of digging themselves out of a deficit or not have to cut back any further on critical support programs.

This is a double edged sword for many of the companies doing business online. For more than 10 years sales on internet purchased items have been free of many of the taxes that we pay when we go to the physical store. This has been a huge competitive advantage over the local corner bookshop or the larger brick and mortar operations like Barnes and Nobel as well as Boarders. Add to that the advent of market pricing on books down to a penny, it is often very easy to find a brand new hard cover book going for one cent on Amazon, that even with the 3.99 dollar postage that a person pays makes the entire sales tax argument moot. What is 8.5% of 1 penny? You would have to sell 100 penny books to make 8.5 cents in sales taxes. This is not the way to dig a state coffer out of a fiscal deficit, 8.5 cents does not go very far at all.

This does not include the regularly priced books, but competition is fierce on Amazon, EBay and other systems like Alibris who will all end up collecting sales tax on deeply discounted items. It would be interesting to see what this move actually adds to the state budget because odds are highly likely that when states go and do their price comparisons they are pulling the normal suggested retail price and not taking into account that almost everything on any ecommerce site is so deeply discounted that actual state revenues are going to be minimal at best.

Taxing the sales though online is fair and probably an idea well past its time. Although this might dent online sales, it will not for long because the long term damage is already done to the local marketplace. The corner bookstore is dead. Many of the Mom and Pop operations who did not or could not go onto the internet or did not start selling deeply discounted items on Amazon, EBay, Alibris, or the host of other sites is already gone. People have no place but Wall-mart for some items where they will pay state sales tax. Other items are only available online; they just are not available in the brick and mortar world. In the end, shoppers will still find deep discounts online; they just might have to pay tax on it for a change. At least the sales tax will be on the final value of the product, and not on the full price value that the states are probably basing their tax estimates on.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Jesse Stay hits the Copyright Wall

Jesse Stay is one of the better people to follow on the internet and his writing is always interesting to read, plus he also owns Social Too and has written two books as well. Jesse is no stranger to generating content, startups, and some generally interesting reading on his blog. What has apparently happened is that Jessie has noticed that Google is stripping his ads off his RSS feed, shoving his full content into Buzz, and then monetizing the content without Jessie getting a dime. As he states on his blog today

To be clear, I’m fine with them either displaying the ads that I put there (and allowing me to monetize off the other ads that are on the page), or just summarizing the article and encouraging users to click through to my site. I’m not okay with Google scraping my content, stripping my ads, altering my content, and pushing it out for them to get 100% of the revenues off of something I spent time and money making. Source: Stayin’ Alive

What makes this interesting to me is that there seems to be two types of copyright, copyright for big corporations under the rule of Law like the DMCA, and the forthcoming ACTA (which should scare you if you read Micheal Geist), then there is copyright for the rest of us. Bloggers who deal with scrapers is a daily issue. What makes this more interesting is the number of headlines from such companies as the MPAA who had to remove the MPAA Toolkit for copyright infringement. There is the long drawn out battle between Shepard Fairey and the AP over a picture of Obama where copyright was clearly in dispute over who owned what. Pictures of Obama being used in Fashion Ads. There is a 15 year old Dallas student who without permission find their pictures ripped from Flickr and used in an advertising campaign in Australia. Or even big media companies like ESPN playing commercials that used pictures that did not belong to them and the owner was not compensated. Google is no new comer to this controversy – they are desperately trying to get a book settlement through the courts that allows them to scan books that are without findable owners and drop them into their search system.

Jessie, and indeed many bloggers and people who actually do create new content are at the rock and hard place. While it great to add a CC 2.0 share and share alike copyright, or even insist on full copyright of all materials on our blogs, the reality is that many people are trying to make money off of what creators write. It is not just limited to shady scrapers, it has permeated the entire culture, we scrape we make money. It is everywhere, my fair share notification each week shows me tens of sites that scrape every single article I write. I have only authorized two sites to use content from my two original blogs.

This is where things get interesting, and where it might be time for bloggers to take a deep look at what is happening to our content on the internet. How it is used, who uses it and who monetizes it. How we share monetization from the major advertising systems that use our content to make money. How we view full text feeds which are popular and in many cases necessary to keep readers. I do not recommend a RIAA/MPAA style pogrom, but a deep research project in how much money is really made by others monetizing content while the creators get little or nothing. We might find that we are ahead of the game or behind the game, but maybe it is time to seriously look at the blogging model we have now, and see if there is a way to ensure that the few copyrights we do have are respected and not subverted by a larger company.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

TED Talks the Next Age of Government

David Cameron is a British politician, Leader ...
Image via Wikipedia

David Cameron from the UK’s Conservative party hits the nail on the head when it comes to the idea of government that is less empowered as people become more empowered to accomplish tasks and goals that previously took the power of government to accomplish. This makes for a hot messy government system regardless of the starting point, theocracy, democracy, communist, or somewhere in-between them. We have seen this take place in China, Iran is struggling now, and we have seen this happen in the USA to a great extent as well. The video below is the TED Talk from David, and it is something everyone should watch because it is now time for Government to face the same disruptive changes that Media, Software Development, and Manufacturing have seen in the last 10 years.

I agree with the fundamental agreement that David makes, as today many of us whether we realize it or not have the ability to gather together a great international team of the best and smartest people to solve a problem or make something new. As long as there is a way to compensate people, anyone can do just about anything on a global basis. You can see this in action over at Cloud Ave, where a worldwide cadre of bloggers have gotten together to discuss Cloud Computing and issues that are facing companies today. Cloud Ave is not the first one to do this, but true to its beginnings, it relies on Cloud Computing via Zoho to make this happen.

What makes this something we all should be thinking about is that the big government of today is slowly going to reduce itself because it is not needed in its current bloated and deadlocked format. The rise of smaller communities of interest around an issue are what future government looks like at all levels from your town to your state to your nation, and in some cases internationally.

This is going to cause a fundamental shift in how companies operate on the national level and how people interact with their representatives. What will government look like in 20 to 30 years might be more in line with the smaller government that we started out with in the USA, other countries will see larger disruptive effects because they are based on the “cult of power” centered on a person or an ideal that is slowly fading over time. We are in as disruptive a time as the move from Hunter Gatherer to Towns, and from Agriculture to Industry. How we manage all our institutions will be the true demarcation point for what the future will look like.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875 ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875