Category Archives: web 2.0

Who controls what happens in your browser

Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...
Image via CrunchBase

Interesting tidbit over at Techdirt this morning about a Grease Monkey script called Fluff Busting Purity formerly known as Facebook Purity. While the Techdirt article is good, there are some interesting side issues here that should be noted.

Many people run scripts within their browser that kills data coming in from web sites, most popular ones are the ad blocking software that has caused so much angst for people who try to make a living or at least a little pocket change from the ads on their site. This includes Ars Technica doing a trial of blocking content if the ads are blocked.

Facebook presents an interesting issue of “who controls what you render in your browser” by taking on Facebook Purity under a number of different concepts. One is the well understood “brand image” process where something using a brand name is generally a bad idea, meaning that Facebook Purity was taken down because the software used the name “facebook” as its software name. Generally this is well understood even if you can put up an “I hate facebook site” much like the popular “I hate starbucks site” or other negative sites concerning big brand names. But in an interesting tactic Facebook deleted the Fan Page for Facebook Purity as commented on the now named “Fluff busing purity” site:

Well Facebook decided to kill the F.B. Purity Fan Page, with practically zero notice, at the time of execution the page had 5042 fans, and I had spent a hell of a long time building the community up. How goddamn rude of them! Now they are after this domain too, and they seem to be intent on shutting down the script… Yet another example of this *^%&%^ company treating their users with contempt. Source: Fluff Busing Purity

Techdirt brings in the idea that:

So the guy changed the name to Fluff Busting Purity. No trademark issue at all. But Facebook is still complaining. The thing is, this is a Greasemonkey user script — meaning that everything happens in the user’s browser — which Facebook has no claim over. If you tell your browser to ignore certain things on a website, that should be your choice. This add-on is there to help people who want it, such that it makes Facebook more useful to them. Source: Techdirt http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100324/1806018708.shtml

It is well worth reading the FB Purity news page also linked from the developers Twitter page. Facebook is in general pulling out the big legal folks and generally going after the developer. This makes this more of an issue of what happens when someone writes a script that people use that masks content in the browser on the user’s machine. There is a bigger picture here as ad blocking software and other scripts that block content from the server to the browser are very popular. While this might not hit the courts, there is already many blocking type software packages out there. Even Google with its “Safe Search” option blocks information from people who do not want to see it. Realistically, if Facebook wins this one, the control of what is rendered in the browser is at stake, with a deeper ramification to ad blocking software and other software that performs the same function.

Facebook has taken out a larger dragnet with larger implications than one grease monkey script, and opened another issue that has not been dealt with by the courts. The issue is what control does a user have over what a server sends them. Law needs to catch up with technology if that is possible, and while it is unlikely to go to court, this is a bigger issue and one that we should all take notice of in general. People love ad blocker scripts and software, people love scripts like FB Purity, and companies generally hate them because it damages revenue streams. At some point, this issue will go to the courts, and when it does, people need to win to keep control of what happens in their browser.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Ars Technica goes all whiny about ad blocking

Ars Technica
Image via Wikipedia

There is a lot to be said about advertising on your favorite sites, it has become the defacto page real estate sucking exercise as many people try to monetize their sites using advertising. There was a very real reason why I turned off advertising across all the sites I run, it was the lack of clicks because that is what my sites needed to make any money. Then there was the page load factor, some advertising networks could take as long as 10 seconds to load up an ad, meaning that impatient people got a poor experience on the web sites I run because of long page loads. My situation is far from Ars Technica in terms of running and making money off of ads, but similar, we are both trying to write things that are interesting enough for people to want to read, and bring in page views that make for a popular site.

It seems though that Ars Technica over the weekend ran an interesting experiment where people who are using ad blockers in their browsers were showed no content. If you used an ad blocker and went to Ars during the experiment, then you saw a blank page. Of course, this would mean that there would be a flood of email either supporting or not supporting the movement. What makes this all the more interesting is that some people understood, and in the reporting by Ars Technica, there was at least one show of support from a person for the experiment.

Advertising can be controversial, with some sites you are looking at almost 50% of the page that is devoted to Ads, MySpace in its halcyon days had upwards of 15 ads per page, and even I carried ads and saw a modest return on those ads. The problem lately though from multiple viewpoints is that the number of ads per page has become abusive; we are there for content, not to have advertising thrown in your face with interstitials, music ads, voice ads, auto-playing movie ads, ½ the web page devoted to ads, or many of the other egregious uses of advertising on a web page. While Ars Technica has few ads on their pages, the root cause of ad blockers was the egregious overuse of advertising on the pages. Along with the random danger of a malware ad making it into the advertising system to compromise computers. People voted and they started using ad blockers.

For web sites that need or rely on advertising to help pay the bills, ad blocking can be devastating as Ars Technica points out. For sites who could care less about monetizing and are busy building out their writing skills and working on the blogging craft, ad blockers cause little to no damage. The whine that Ars Technica brings up though is that Ad Blockers are devastating to the sites you love is just one view on what has been a rocky road of the whole process of ad blocking. Sure, for some it can be devastating, but the 73 Million people who have downloaded Adblock Plus for Firefox have a very different opinion of what is and what is not devastating to the user experience. I think that this is something we forget, ads are ok in many respects, and with the two ads on Ars Technica is it not that big a deal to let the ads show. The problem comes in with sites that have 10’s of ads on the site that flash, blink, and play noise. That is what ad blocking is all about, the user experience.

We need more web sites to remember that it is the readers, when they come to the site they want a nice clean experience, not an audio/visual assault that some ads and web advertising agencies throw at readers. Ars Technica has the right number of ads that are nice and low key, but the idea of blocking content for people who are using ad-blocking software is only going to cause problems down the road. If Ars Technica is doing this, you can absolutely bet that the NY Times, and other troubled newspapers are thinking about the same thing. Blocking content from people who do not want to see ½ of the page devoted to ads.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

How to make a graphically rich web site search engine friendly

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase

Some folks might know that we started our own ebook publishing company and the big announcement will be at Emerald City Comic Con on the 13th of March 2010. What has been interesting though is as we have been busy building the web site, we are working a lot with Google Web Master tools, guidelines, and the Web Master Checklist in building the site because it is graphically rich.

About 80% of the web site is going to be images, as we are offering a free cover browser, free to read online comics that are copyright expired or have moved into the public domain as a way to show our work and the things that can be done with Amazon DTP, PDF’s, and then just skimming through the comic books online. When dealing with a graphically rich web site, having enough text for the search engines to bite into so that they can spider the site is very important. According to Google, these are the types of files that Google can scan:

• Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf)
• Adobe PostScript (.ps)
• Atom and RSS feeds (.atom, .rss)
• Autodesk Design Web Format (.dwf)
• Google Earth (.kml, .kmz)
• Lotus 1-2-3 (.wk1, .wk2, .wk3, .wk4, .wk5, .wki, .wks, .wku)
• Lotus WordPro (.lwp)
• MacWrite (.mw)
• Microsoft Excel (.xls)
• Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt)
• Microsoft Word (.doc)
• Microsoft Works (.wks, .wps, .wdb)
• Microsoft Write (.wri)
• Open Document Format (.odt)
• Rich Text Format (.rtf)
• Shockwave Flash (.swf)
• Text (.ans, .txt)
• Wireless Markup Language (.wml, .wap)
Source: Google

Nowhere in there is JPG, PNG, or GIF files that we are using. Therefore, this has required a liberal use of the tag to describe the image. While we are not interested in “keyword stuffing” because of its negative effects, what we are interested in is describing the picture. So our alt tag looks something like this and that seems to be in line with the expectations of Google, meaning it will work with just about any search engine. The other part of this was to make sure each page has a title, and that the title was SEO friendly. We are also using a lot of meta tags throughout the site to help search engines spider the site better.

This is one of the more interesting aspects of designing and developing a graphically rich web site, in that the use of with good descriptors, and the use of Meta Tags are about the only real way of giving search engines enough information to spider, without distracting the reader from the content on the page, which is a scanned image of a comic book page. If there are other ways of doing this, drop a note below, it would be interesting to hear other people’s experiences in designing a graphically rich web site that is search engine friendly.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Startup Weekend Hits SXSW 2010

Startup Weekend and Piryx are working on the 2nd Annual Piryxtopia Charity Bash – this is your chance to donate 20 bucks and get tickets to meet up with Startup Weekend and Pyrix. This also ties into the idea of doing startup support in Haiti via We Hear Your Voice.

You need to go here http://314.piryx.com and register for the event. You will be asked for a donation. You also need to pick up a handy identification card that will be available at SXSW at supporter booths that will found throughout the SXSW event. You can hit their Facebook page to get a direct map of where all the booths and people are that will have one of the lodge cards for you to get involved. They state:

In order to attend this event, guests must pick-up a Piryx 314 card beforehand. These cards will be circulating during the first 2 days of SXSW and can be obtained through any Piryx, or Startup Weekend employee. Cards will be also available through supporters and booths scattered around SXSW. Join our Facebook Event Page to learn about who and where these folks are. The cards must be registered in advance, which will automatically put your name on the list for the party. A $20 donation to We Hear Your Voice is the suggested entry price for the event – there will be a $5 discount if you tweet out a message with the hashtag “Pi4Haiti”, and show it to the person giving out the cards. Source: Piryx.com

If you are going to SXSW, this is one event that has many benefits, meet the right people who sponsor startups like Startup Weekend, hook up with Piryx for corporate giving and help the folks in Haiti. Of course all of this is going to even cooler when Startup Weekend goes down to Haiti to help startups get off the ground once the internet is back up and running. Right now the main lines are still down as the major internet points were taken out during the earthquake. Right now everyone is on Sattelite communications, but there are teams down there now helping the country at least get the internet back up and running.

When Startup Weekend announces the event for Haiti – look for that news here. In the mean time help everyone get back up on their feet, do the donation and support Startup Weekend, Piryx and Haiti.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Social Media as Storytelling

Making Friends - Marketing Cartoon
Image by HubSpot via Flickr

The more I look at social media, the more it reminds me of storytelling. A person can be telling stories around a camp fire with a small audience, or telling stories around the world in mass releases of information. The better the story the more people that will engage with the subject and the better your social media efforts will be. Social media people must be excellent story tellers that can engage and get an audience participate in the story so that it becomes theirs.

The major issues with that are getting people to do an action. We are passive by nature, and you can see this in a great many things that we do, we are numb already, we find it difficult to take action as evidenced by this attack in the Seattle Metro Tunnel – people including those in authority stood by as a young 15 year old girl was attacked. The public outcry afterwards was a form of action, but our numb inactive society in the USA precludes people participating in the story. We view everything as a passive information flow from the computer or TV to our brains to be digested. Honestly under the good Samaritan laws I would have been in the middle of this trying to keep the two people apart screaming for the cops, but then that is the kind of person I am, I am rarely passive in my actions.

You can see a different form of call to action with Conversation Marketing supporting a Portland Oregon SEO firm that was attacked by a Colorado based SEO firm. But the call fell short when I read all the information on it, it seems that the whole thing is unhappy, but not a story that I will get involved with.

Then the final kind of argument that resonates and hits me where my belief system lives, and that is in Amber Naslund (From Altitude) where she talks about Social Media and Accountability. She spins a down to earth story in that yes we really can do the things we need to do to be measurable and accountable, even if we do not want to. This is a story I can dive into and feel the need to respond, even if there is not a good response other than “hear hear”.

Sometimes all we can do is agree with the story teller, other times we fail to engage because it seems like both parties were at fault, and in other ways we are so outraged that we have to do something. This is the art of good story telling, you get the response you need by how well you tell the story.

If you look at Dairy Queen as a case study and go back to all the places that DQ invested in, their blog, Facebook, and other systems, they are telling a story. But they are telling everyone’s story as they encounter the brand. You see behind the scenes processes and real people with pictures, contests, prizes and the ability to connect with DQ on a level that is impossible when you walk into the store. The story telling on the DQ Blog is enough to lead someone to the belief that they are real people doing real things to bring you tasty treats. Dairy Queen has made an art form of storytelling on the systems that they engage in. The approaches that DQ takes in their social media process is low key, responsible, providing an opportunity for people to engage on a much deeper level than walking into the local DQ and ordering a Blizzard.

It is the social media that fails that we see where the art of storytelling has failed. You see this in the thousands of fly by night twitter accounts, failed blogs and failed outposts in Facebook. It was not that these people did not have a story, but that the story being told failed to engage the audience. Of course there is always the chance at twitter millions for 29.99 (just drop a check in the mail), but you have to take a look at social media not only by what can be measured, but by what story you are trying to tell.

If you are a university and you want to talk about student life, do not just tell everyone about the great benefits that students have interview people and get their stories, post pictures of student life, have a podcast, have an outpost on Facebook for students, and engage students in how they access and consume information. If you are running an active student life section, do not forget the calendar to show what is coming next so that people can make plans to attend. Student life is not your life, it is theirs and they should be telling the story. You are simply the person in the middle that is writing text and editing audio and video segments.

This brings me to the many open jobs I have seen in social media over the last 90 days, because companies are starting to get serious about being on board with social media. I looked over a couple of the job openings and the first question I had is what is the companies’ story? You can go visit their web site and see what they do, you can go visit Glassdoor and Jobvent to see how happy the employees are, you can talk to current employees via Facebook or LinkedIn. But you do not get the companies stories; you get individual stories about the company through the lens of job satisfaction. This often leads to thoughts on corporate reputation management which in some ways what corporate level social networking is also all about.

On two different sides we are telling stories, we tell stories to tell what a responsible corporation we are (brand management) and we tell stories to engage people into action (to sell stuff). The question we need to start asking now of our social networking folks is “Just how good a story teller are you”?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875 ss_blog_claim=3c1696ce5b8393dba57964d7ee0d0875